Re: Precompiled include files
- Posted by mattlewis (admin) Aug 12, 2013
- 1349 views
jaygade said...
Admittedly I'm testing with 4.05 on Windows right now. Maybe my example is too small or it's different on 4.1.0 -- I'll have to test it later.
It looks like 4.1 is better at removing things. I think this is probably due to better routine_id analysis. When I tried your examples using a 4.1 translator, I checked for the respective to_string/to_number that wasn't used, and they weren't there where you'd expect them to not be there.
Matt