Re: new DOS source
- Posted by DerekParnell (admin) Jul 09, 2013
- 3955 views
I see three ways of interpreting that response.
1) You simply agree it's in the "recognize it on sight" case.
2) You think my question is nonsensical, or pointless.
3) You intend to keep the definition vague enough to be able to consistently deny the existence of a 'real need' regardless of circumstances.
Well done. Take a bow.
In retrospect, I could have worded that better. But if you make a claim to be able to maintain the DOS edition, then I believe it's a valid move to question your credentials and/or technical skills in relation to that claim. (Something like code samples or professional references would be enough to affirm that claim, imvho.)
I'm beginning to see what Kat sees in you.
I was almost ready to resume working on Euphoria again but maybe not so much now. Thanks Jim.