Re: Does anyone have a copy of eukat's irc.e?
- Posted by jimcbrown (admin) Jun 04, 2013
- 1802 views
I could not get Jeremy's irc.e to work. I sent bugmagnet a copy of my irc3-stable.e that does work on Eu v4.0.5 development , revision 10 Feb 2013.
Ok, lets fight about timezones.
D'oh! Not sure why it didn't sink in at first.
I didn't, i didn't say i did. But there's no point keeping it. I do not take the blame for others not likeing it either.
So you delete code that others like? I don't get that reasoning.
Yea, even the Eu parts, apparently. Even the 100% Eu code, apparently.
Again, I contend that these were accepted.
I am not officially volunteering it. Look at all the time wasted already on this. This is why i didn't do the bug reports in the last year either, i let someone else file them all.
The ironic thing is that it would have only taken a few minutes to submit an irc.e for consideration. Sometimes I'll make a patch, report it someplace, and never visit it again - I figure the devs there will know if it's worthwhile or not, and that fact that it was reported means that if someone in the future needs it, even if those devs don't like it, it is still available to those who want that patch.
What the heck is that?
A "port" of w32lib to GTK.
I suspect that it'd be fairly easy to use that to make a version that directly works with the latest w32lib from Derek, but I'm not the person to ask about that.
Not at all. I was glad for the chance to clarify the misconceptions that you held about me.
You only reaffirmed them.
Well, if you continue to believe I want you to delete your code, despite my repeated arguments against it, then that's certainly your prerogative.
irc.e was declined,
Who declined it? I was on the dev list and saw no traffic about this. Whoever declined it did so wrongly.
I don't remember. What i remember is being told Jeremy was working on an irc.e, and you (the group of devs, i expect, not you personally, i do not remember) preferred his. His quietly drops the connection, which seems to be a odd feature to prefer.
And the full-featured eubot, disregarded.
Well, all I can say is if an irc.e was offered, and declined, it was done wrongly.
The current IRC bot for the channel, eubotmar2, is based on her eubot, which is fairly complex.
I've tried to work with that code (probably a couple of years ago now), but I think something was missing, and I couldn't get it to work. Part of the problem, I'm sure, is that I don't know anything about IRC from a protocol perspective, and barely as a user.
Matt
My apologies. If you want, I can help you look into it. I probably did forget something. :(
I don't recall sending you a copy. If you got it from jimcbrown, keep in mind he had buggered it. The copy i had been sending out logged onto dalnet, freenode, and sorcery, even all 3 at the same time. It worked.
Well, I'm surprised that you tested it with freenode, considering you didn't register your nick there until 2008 - well after I had discovered the bug in YOUR CODE that made it unable to connect to freenode.
