Re: Interpreter startup speed
Juergen Luethje wrote:
>
> Pete Lomax wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:10:58 -0700, Al Getz wrote:
> >
> >> Kat wrote:
> >>> Hey, Al, i have a silly suggestion:
> >
> > 
)
> >
> >> Yes, that is a very good idea :)
> >
> > Yeah, (sarcasm, btw) so you release your new program, but it needs
> > display server to be installed and running first? Why not just bind it
> > and the problem goes away?
> >
> >> On the other hand, i guess it would be simpler to just bind the
> >> program, but i wanted to get away from that because i like running
> >> many of my programs in .exw mode.
>
> Then using Eu 2.4 should be fine, or including shrouded libraries in the
> main program (which might be written in Eu 2.5), or using libraries that
> previously have been compiled to DLLs or SOs.
>
> > Oh, you thought of that already, now I'm lost. What you are saying is
> > that _you_ want a splash screen for _your_ program when _you_ already
> > know it will _still_ take 30s to load? Why?
> >
> > Confused,
> > Pete
>
> I'm happy that I'm not the only one who is confused here. 
> Al, some possibilities to reduce startup time have already been
> mentioned, but it seems that you don't want to use any of them.
> My first impression was, that you wanted to make an omelette without
> breaking eggs -- now it almost looks to me as if you want to break eggs
> without making an omelette.
>
> Regards,
> Juergen
>
> --
> Please excuse my flawed English. My native language is Euphoria.
Hi Juergen,
No, i guess what i want is 2.5 to be as fast as 2.4 for loading.
Period. Did i break any eggs this time? hee hee I'm gettin hungry
anyway as it's breakfast time in this part of the world :)
Take care,
Al
E boa sorte com sua programacao Euphoria!
My bumper sticker: "I brake for LED's"
From "Black Knight":
"I can live with losing the good fight,
but i can not live without fighting it".
"Well on second thought, maybe not."
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
