Re: Re[2]: sleep() standard function
- Posted by Pete Lomax <petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk> Aug 19, 2006
- 512 views
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 10:36:49 +0800, aku saya <akusaya at gmx.net> wrote: >But laptop users will be angry. > >If you use windows, use Sleep in kernel32. Aye. As Kat said, I think (I just deleted the message, sorry), Sleep(0) will relinquish the timeslice, whereas Sleep(-1) is a bit more permanent (until a mouse message or similar, I think). Regards, Pete
