OpenEuphoria

Re: What pushes you away from Euphoria?

• Posted by Al Getz <Xaxo at aol.com> Aug 18, 2006
• 683 views

Bernie Ryan wrote:
> 
> Al Getz wrote:
> > 
> > Hello again,
> > 
> > I forgot to mention one thing before that affects only programs using
> > v2.5 and not v2.4 .
> > That is, the time to open a file is much longer with the 2.5 version
> > and that is not good on my system.  I have a decent system and it's
> > still too slow.
> 
> Al:
> 
>    This is too general a comment.
>    What kind of time are you talking about ?
>    Winclass library does not seem to be that slow considering
>    all the include files you are using.
>    
>    You might try shrouding your code with ver 2.4 to see if that improves
>    the loading speed using ver 2.5 to run a program.
>    ( This would be sort of like pre-compiling the code )
> 
>    When version 2.5 first came out I was building sequence dynamically
>    at load time and found this slowed loading time way down.
> 
> Bernie
> 
> My files in archive:
> WMOTOR, XMOTOR, W32ENGIN, MIXEDLIB, EU_ENGIN, WIN32ERU, WIN32API 
> 
> Can be downloaded here:
> <a
> href="http://www.rapideuphoria.com/cgi-bin/asearch.exu?dos=on&win=on&lnx=on&gen=on&keywords=bernie+ryan">http://www.rapideuphoria.com/cgi-bin/asearch.exu?dos=on&win=on&lnx=on&gen=on&keywords=bernie+ryan</a>


Hi Bernie,

I havent tried shrouding yet, maybe that would help, but i really liked
the way the v2.4 worked...i didnt need to do anything.
Yes, if you have big sequences to build that will add to the time to
'load', but that's another issue.  Im just talking about compile time.


Take care,
Al

E boa sorte com sua programacao Euphoria!


My bumper sticker: "I brake for LED's"

 From "Black Knight":
"I can live with losing the good fight,
 but i can not live without fighting it".
"Well on second thought, maybe not."