Re: What pushes you away from Euphoria?
CChris wrote:
> Juergen Luethje wrote:
> >
> > Pete Lomax wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 17:25:42 -0700, Jeremy Peterson
> > > <guest at RapidEuphoria.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> The point is that Ed should be removed from the Euphoria package.
> > >> I think so and apparently so do some of the others.
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > Neither you nor anyone else has any umbrage whatsoever with Ed being
> > > quietly installed with each and every new version of Eu from now till
> > > eternity.
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > I agree. If someone gets pushed away from Euphoria by the existence of
> > Ed, it would be similar to the following situation:
> >
> > Someone buys a new car, say a Porsche, and the sales assistant
> > additionally gives him a bottle of wine. Then the customer thinks: "Hu,
> > I like beer but not wine, so next time I'll better buy a Mercedes." 
> >
>
> I am not sure that was his point.
>
> A package is supposed to attract people and entice them to buy more.
> Ed is definitely a weak selling point,
I agree. But it's existence is not a reason for _not_ using/buying
Euphoria. That is the point as I understood it.
> and removing it would help Rob probably.
Why?
> I personally don't care as I don't use it - there are much
> more useful programming editors freely available on the Net.
The same holds true for me. I just ignore Ed, and it doen't hurt me
in any way.
Regards,
Juergen
--
Please excuse my flawed English. My native language is Euphoria.
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
