Re: Jiri and his 'Hints'
- Posted by Tony Bucholtz <tonyb at SOUTHPACFINANCE.COM.AU> May 01, 2000
- 431 views
On Sun, 30 Apr 2000 09:15:46 +1000, Aidan Bindoff <abindoff at ONE.NET.AU> wrote: > A Euphoria to C translator would be a huge step towards putting Euphoria > into the mainstream, and increasing our resource base. > <snip> Hello Euphorians I'm a Euphoria newbie, or maybe "fossil newbie" would be better, as I program in (gulp) COBOL for a living and know nothing about C, C++, Windows programming, or anything else invented recently. This is also my first post to the list, so be kind I may be missing the point on the Eupiler issue, but I agree that a Eu to C translator would be a big step towards the real thing. That would definitely help move Eu closer to the mainstream. However, if what we really want is easier access to C code, libraries, etc, why not create a C to Eu translator and move the mainstream towards Euphoria? On the question of 200K "hello world" programs, would it be possible to write a sort of "half way" compiler for Eu? What I'm thinking of is something that translates Eucode into a tokenized version (I think this is already part of Euphoria, but forgive me if I'm wrong as I'm just a newbie) and the tokenized code could then be executed by a version of the existing runtime. This "pseudo-compiler" should give us some speed improvements, as the tokenization has already happened, and will let us run the code with a single runtime rather than embedding it into every EXE program. Or am I being too simple-minded? Regards Tony (a.k.a. TriloByte, the fossil computerist)