Re: Euphoria 3.0?
Hayden McKay wrote:
>
> Jeremy Peterson wrote:
> >
> > I sorta agree.
> > Rob said in another post that he doesn't want to support 1 editor over
> > another.
>
> I understand what your saying but I'm not not talking about 'bundling' an
> already
> existing editor into the Euphoria download package, since you can freely
> download
> one anyway. I'm talking about a real 'official' eu-editor
> coded by the Eu-Guru.
>
> nb. Possibly coded in euphoria. (euphoria language is quite capable doing
> just that)
I'd love to see something like this, but there are several problems...
1. Some people will complain that Rob should instead be working on Euphoria.
2. Rob will probably either:
Say he is too busy
Say there are already editors available
Say he's too lazy ;) (No offense, Rob)
If you've been here a while or read the Archives you might also have noticed
that Rob is rather slow to do anything that might make more sales of Euphoria...
> > Then there's the crossplatform issue...
>
> Yes, but there are two very different distributions for both linux and
> windows.
>
> > Why not have a Win32 Editor and a Linux Editor come with Euphoria?
>
> Yep!
>
> Even though I've looked at 'Ubunto' and 'SimplyMEPIS' I have'nt tried out
> Euphoria on them so I am unable to comment on the linux side of things.
>
> >
> > Jeremy
>
> Hayden McKay...
If it was coded in Euphoria using an xplat library like WXEU or WMOTOR, that
would take care of any cross-platform issues.
IMO tho' this is all a waste of time. 99.9999999999999999% of
ideas-proposals-suggestions by this community are either ignored by Rob or given
good-bad reasons why he won't do it. Or 2 years later they are implemented.
I'm not complaining; I think Euphoria is ok, what I can't imagine is how Rob
puts food on the table selling Euphoria?
Jeremy
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
