OpenEuphoria

Re: Euphoria 2.5

• Posted by "Igor Kachan" <kinz at peterlink.ru> Jul 31, 2004
• 902 views

Hi CK again,

You wrote:

----------
> From: cklester <guest at RapidEuphoria.com>
> To: EUforum at topica.com
> Subject: Re: Euphoria 2.5
> Sent: 28 jul 2004 y. 22:22
> 
> posted by: cklester <cklester at yahoo.com>
> 
> Igor, your version of s[length(s)] doesn't 
> quite work perfectly...
> 
> Run this:
> -- start of code
> include get.e
> 
> sequence junk
> 
> integer A_
> type sequence_with_length_A(sequence a)
>   A_= length(a)
>   return sequence(a)
> end type
> 
> sequence_with_length_A A_A, A_B, A_C
> 
> A_A = "Hello"
> A_B = "World"
> A_C = "Goodbye!"
> 
> ?A_A[A_]
> ?A_B[A_]
> ?A_C[A_]
> 
> --end of code
> 
> Sure, you could define B_ and C_, but 
> what happens when you have
> a billion sequences? :)

Try please new version of that
hard game:

integer A, B, C, D, E -- to billion
type sequences_with_lengths(sequence a)
  A=length(a[1])
  B=length(a[2])
  C=length(a[3])
  D=length(a[4])
  E=length(a[5])
   -- to billion
    return 1
end type

sequences_with_lengths  S

S={{1,2,3},
   {4,5,6,7},
   {7,8,9,8,9},
   {1,3,5,7,9,0},
   {0,2,4,6,8,1,1}}
-- to billion
? A
? B
? C
? D
? E
? S[1][A]
? S[2][B]
? S[3][C]
? S[4][D]
? S[5][E]

S[3] = {11,12}

? C
? S[3][C]
-- and so on

This is old good Euphoria 
programming language, isn't it?
Just now, works for me.

Regards,
Igor Kachan
kinz at peterlink.ru