Re: Bind features
- Posted by Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen <nieuwen at XS4ALL.NL> Jun 30, 1999
- 612 views
> 1. After processing a constant declaration, all the data and > code used in calculating the constants value is freed. e.g. > > constant SIZE=10+100-22*foobar({1,2,3,4,5}) Robert, wouldn't you above example, not generate 1) the four bytes needed to store the value *and* 2) the fourthy two bytes to store the code that calculates the constant. I mean: constant my_string = "Hello, world" Is in the code, in the memory of the interpreter, even before it is executed. Therefor it is in memory twice, unlike information loaded from a resource file. > 2. Whether bound or not, the operating system only > loads the Euphoria interpreter into memory. It is then > up to Euphoria to open a file (the same .exe file, in the case > of a bound executable) and read in your Euphoria program. > As a quick test, I added 40 Mb of garbage onto the end of > a bound .exe file. It had no effect of the speed of running the > .exe. Obviously, the operating system was not trying to load > the 40 Mb of garbage into the 32 Mb of memory on the machine. Really ? I can remember all kinds of 'program does not fit in memory' errors on my old 286. Trying to free-up conventional memory, unloading device drivers, etc. It were not errors generated by the program I believe, rather by the OS. I trust your word though, it does suprises me. Is the executable information load-on-demand ? Which would almost appear as if the OS is interpreting the executable file, rather than the chipset, which was my guess. Ralf N.