Re: we need official libs

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Rob said:
>I'm more interested here in functions that multiple people
>have actually encountered a need for, rather than functions
>that someone *imagines* might be useful.

The functions that i have in mind are those that are commonly used. And
didn't i mention in my original post that having the PI constant, functions
arcsin() and arccos() in misc.e is kind of awkward?

As for seq-related functions, they seem to need no notice for now, as you
guys have already shifted to attempting to compile a math library. Keep it
up, you're doing fine!

-------
Sometimes I post a message and then dissapear, even as the replies come and
the thread grows. Sorry about it! I should have said this earlier: I
actually only sit at my computer on weekends and some rare weekdays, hence
my sloth in following the mailing list. So don't be surprised now if i ever
reply to a message several days old!
After reading what was apparently Rob's early disaproval of my request, I
wanted to suggest simply *stamping an existing math library* as an
alternative. But then u guys start posting and voting functions...i feel
pretty cool!! 8)

Lionel


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu