Re: retrograding bits of 2.1 to 2.0 'A WORKAROUND'

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Colin Taylor wrote:

>Hey Norm,
>
>You really ought to upgrade to 2.1 because it's faster and better and runs
>all your 2.0 stuff.  Having said that, here's the reverse{} function
>slightly modified so that it works under 2.0. [snip]

D'oh! I forgot about those darn += operators -- misc.e from EU 2.1 will
*not* work in EU 2.0. Apologies for my stupidity there.

>You really ought to upgrade to 2.1 because it's faster and better and runs
>all your 2.0 stuff.

I must agree -- if you want the advantages of 2.1, upgrade. All your old
code will still work.

Again, sorry for my dumb suggestion earlier -- I'm not feeling 100% today...


 ------
"When we have nothing to say, better to say nothing."
Robert Fripp

"Now *there's* a piece of advice I should pay attention to more often."
Gabriel Boehme
 ------

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu