Re: retrograding bits of 2.1 to 2.0 'A WORKAROUND'
- Posted by "Boehme, Gabriel" <gboehme at POBOXB1.HQ.MSMAIL.MUSICLAND.COM> Jun 16, 1999
- 377 views
Colin Taylor wrote: >Hey Norm, > >You really ought to upgrade to 2.1 because it's faster and better and runs >all your 2.0 stuff. Having said that, here's the reverse{} function >slightly modified so that it works under 2.0. [snip] D'oh! I forgot about those darn += operators -- misc.e from EU 2.1 will *not* work in EU 2.0. Apologies for my stupidity there. >You really ought to upgrade to 2.1 because it's faster and better and runs >all your 2.0 stuff. I must agree -- if you want the advantages of 2.1, upgrade. All your old code will still work. Again, sorry for my dumb suggestion earlier -- I'm not feeling 100% today... ------ "When we have nothing to say, better to say nothing." Robert Fripp "Now *there's* a piece of advice I should pay attention to more often." Gabriel Boehme ------