Re: development ideas for 4.1

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message
  • Posted by jimcbrown (admin) Feb 16, 2011
  • 1592 views
mattlewis said...
DerekParnell said...
SDPringle said...

It would need to be a full preprocessor but it wouldn't have to be a full C parser. It just would need to parse C expressions. That means there would be no need to parse function definitions.

My point still remains ... the exercise will cost more than its worth.

It might be time for someone to try adding euphoria support to SWIG again.

Matt

I liked SWIG.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu