Re: scope of variables

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message
jimcbrown said...

Jeremy seems to be canvasing to look for any opposing opinions. I don't think he's outright opposed to the (so far) generally agreed upon change, but rather trying to look at this from all angles. I think, if no one speaks up opposing coconut's solution, then that is what we'll end up implementing in 4.0.1

He's since made clear that he's firmly against it. (Almost the sole opposing voice.)

mattlewis said...

I'm not sure this needs to be put into 4.0.1. Right now, I'd put it into 4.1. Here's why:

  • This actually was a design decision (albeit not the best we've ever made).
  • It's very easy to work around.
  • It will likely require some significant changes to the front end.

Matt

If it was not for the significant changs to the front end, I'd argue to do it in 4.0.1 anyways.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu