Re: length() of an atom

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message
DerekParnell said...

Yes. The 'it' being that they have the same length.

I understand that it is the goal of the proposal. It is just strange for me to have a length. Probably I am too much influenced by the current error message: "length of an atom is not defined". I get it regularly... blink

DerekParnell said...
Salix said...

But I could leave with returning 1, 0, -1 or anything... :->

I have no idea what you mean by that statement.

(Egh... "live".) All I wanted to say that I can accept your proposal. But I could also accept to have 0 or -1 for the length(atom) call.

Rgds,

Salix

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu