Re: Isn't this wrong?

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message
Kat said...

This runs fine using Eu 3.1:

 
atom retry 


but fails using 4.0:

<0025>:: a name is expected here 
atom retry 


The word retry is a reserved word in Eu 4. It can be used inside loops to repeat the current iteration.

Kat said...

Hmm. Ok, i rename it to retry2, and this runs fine on Eu v4a3 and v4b2:

 
atom retry2 
retry2 = 0 
 
with trace 
trace(1) 
 
while 1 do 
 
     if retry2 then end 
 
     if 
       
end while 


Ok, that is interesting, what with that dangling "if" there, it runs with no errors using 3 Eu interpreters. Well, ok. So i add a few lines...

The 'dangling' if is not really dangling. The IF statement must end with the two words 'end' and 'if' and they do not have to be on the same line.

eg.

-- First statement 
if 
1 
then 
? 1 
end 
if 
 
-- Second statement 
if 1 then ? 1 end if 


Both statements above are identical as far as Eu is concerned.

Kat said...
 
sequence TheWebPage 
TheWebPage = "" 
 
atom retry2 
retry2 = 0 
 
with trace 
trace(1) 
 
while 1 do 
 
 
     if match(upper("<title>404 - Page Not Found</title>"),upper(TheWebPage)) then  
       TheWebPage = "404" 
       exit 
     end 
 
 
     if retry2 then end 
 
     if 
       
end while 


Eu v4a2 says:

Syntax error - expected to see =, +=, -=, *=, /= or &=\\ 
     if retry2 then end\\ 
                   ^\\ 

implying i should start a expression of some sort between "then" and "end", starting with a boolean or math of some sort? Suddenly, the line that ran fine before needs an assigment in it?

Eu v4b2 says:

<0076>:: expected to see an assignment after 'retry2', such as =, +=, -=, *=, /= 
 or &= 
     if retry2 then end 
                   ^ 


but again, pointing to between "then" and "end". Even tho retry2 has been assigned. And why does an assignment after an "if" ? Plus, " if retry2 then end" ran with no errors before i added the code about TheWebPage.

Ok, the error pointer could be improved. Currently the scanner has gotten to the end of the word 'then' and the parser has by now realized that an assignment is required so the error message is correct "expecting to see an assignment" and the '^' pointer is showing you where the scanner is up to. It is sort of saying, "Hey I got 'then' but was expecting some sort of assignment there instead".

Now it was expecting an assignment because the previous IF statement actually uses the 'if' preceding the 'retry2' word as marking the end of the IF statement. Thus 'retry2' is the start of a new statement and the only type of statements that start with a variable are assignment statements.

It seems that you have mistakenly thought that the IF statement was completed by the 'end' word alone, but that is not the case. Look at it laid out differently ...

sequence TheWebPage 
TheWebPage = "" 
 
atom retry2 
retry2 = 0 
 
with trace 
trace(1) 
 
while 1 do 
 
 
     if match(upper("<title>404 - Page Not Found</title>"),upper(TheWebPage)) then  
       TheWebPage = "404" 
       exit 
     end if 
      
     retry2 then end if 
       
end while 

Now is the syntax error obvious?

Kat said...

...

it complained about the dangling "if"....

Just to restate, statements such as IF, WHILE, FOR etc are terminated by a two word combination, and those words do not have to be on the same line. The terminator is 'end' followed by 'if', while', 'for' etc that may or may not be on the same line.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu