OpenEuphoria

Re: Euphoria 2.5

• Posted by "Igor Kachan" <kinz at peterlink.ru> Jul 29, 2004
• 648 views

Hi Juergen,

[snipped old info]
> Igor Kachan wrote:
> >> From: Juergen Luethje
> >> Sent: 28 jul 2004 y. 23:39
> >> Igor Kachan wrote:
> >>> CK Lester wrote:
> >> How should B_ and C_ be defined, and how
> >>  should the appropriate value
> >> be assigned to B_ and C_?
> >> Will you define a separate type for each sequence?
> >>
> >> <snip>
> >
> > Yes,  a separate type for each sequence.
> >
> > }}}
<eucode>
> > integer B_
> > type sequence_with_length_B()
> > ...
> > end type
> >
> > integer C_
> > type sequence_with_length_C()
> > ...
> > end type
> >
> > integer D_
> > type sequence_with_length_D()
> > ...
> > end type
> > </eucode>
{{{

> 
> And what is the advantage compared 
>  to conventional Euphoria programming
> style, i.e. not using all those types,
> but using 'length(A_A)',
> 'length(A_B)' etc. directly?

Really you have just 1 or 2 main sequences in your program.
For example, ed.ex editor.
So, you can enter these types and then 
use A_  or  B_  anywhere you want instead of, say,
length(First_Very_Long_But_Very_Clear_Name_of_Main_Sequence_1)
and
length(Second_Very_Long_But_Very_Clear_Name_of_Main_Sequence_2).

But you could not use $-feature in the same manner,
there is no the separate $-value at all.

Regards,
Igor Kachan
kinz at peterlink.ru