Re: error codes in returns
- Posted by DerekParnell (admin) Sep 11, 2009
- 1159 views
Well, before I mentioned it, your switch statement design hardly was "simple to use". It was just copied blindly from C.
Let me see if I understand you ... you believe it was your effort and persuasive argument that caused the current switch design? And all the hours of discussion before you joined in the discussion were for nothing?
You put a lot of implementation effort in Eu, but I cannot see much design effort.
I believe you. I'm sure you do follow all the discussion, arguments, prototyping, etc... that the developers do outside this forum. However, just because you can't see it, it doesn't mean its not happening.
I think it was [deleted] who had [deleted] of implicit fallthrough being [deleted]. Maybe it's a [deleted] idea for some of the [deleted] to do more [deleted] research. That's what I mean by [deleted]. Now go ahead and bowdlerise (sic) me.
Done.
