include vs. include\std

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

While running some old programs that included machine.e and dll.e, I was getting nuisance warnings. Finally realizing that I should be including std\machine.e and std\dll.e instead, the problems went away. Why are the old .e files still in the distribution? If they must be included, couldn't they be in their own subdirectory - old\dll.e and old\machine.e for example? Leaving out "std" will be a common mistake until we get used to version 4. Not running at all would be a better default than using the wrong file.

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu