Re: New switch/case idea
- Posted by kinz Apr 08, 2009
- 1612 views
Igor, please read Derek's response again. You missed a key point: namely, which routines can be stripped out, either by the binder or the translator.
The overhead of this many routine ids isn't very significant, ultimately, though it would probably be faster to do away with routine ids to begin with, and call the routines directly. When this was done with execute.e, speed was increased by about 5-7%.
Matt
Matt, what specific function or procedure are you talking about? Euphoria 4.0 is Open Source, let me know, please. I can read the concrete Euphoria code. Then I can ask about concrete things. 'Translator or binder' ... it is same thing as to say 'in America'. 4.0 now is alpha, isn't it? You asked about new switch/case ideas. I can provide the specific code sometimes. I asked - Where am I wrong. I'm not talking about some principles, I'm talking about concrete code now. You say execute.e, I'll see execute.e. But compile.e seems to have a problem, sorry.
Let's take time out, OK? I need some break, sorry.
kinz
