OpenEuphoria

Re: New switch/case idea

• Posted by jeremy (admin) Apr 06, 2009
• 1700 views

	case RHS_SUBS then  
	case RHS_SUBS_CHECK then  
	case RHS_SUBS_I then  
		opRHS_SUBS()  
		break 

    	case RHS_SUBS  
        or RHS_SUBS_CHECK   
	or RHS_SUBS_I then  
		opRHS_SUBS()  
		break 

Sort of. The later does not provide the same level of functionality, if required. For the example, they are. But say you had to increment i if RHS_SUBS, but not for RHS_SUBS_CHECK and RHS_SUBS_I... With your example of or, it would not be very easy, however, with the multiple case statement and fall thru, it's easy:

	case RHS_SUBS then  
		i += 1 
	case RHS_SUBS_CHECK then  
	case RHS_SUBS_I then  
		opRHS_SUBS()  
		break 

If it was RHS_SUBS i would be incremented by 1 and the next line to execute would be opRHS_SUBS().

Jeremy