OpenEuphoria

RE: about .NET

• Posted by Tommy Carlier <tommy.carlier at pandora.be> Jul 28, 2004
• 564 views

Philip Deets wrote:
> 
> Sorry, accidently posted that message before I finished writing it.
> 
> Continuing on now:
> 
> I think Euphoria needs a way to interoperate with .NET.  It doesn't have to
> actually
> make .NET applications, but it should have a function similar to open_dll for
> .NET.
>  This way the newest features of the next version of windows can be used in
>  .NET application,
> and if it is done right, euphoria will have the whole .NET Framework to use. 
> This
> would add a ton of great features to euphoria, such as web services, windows
> forms,
> ADO.NET (database access), etc.
> 
> So, basically, I think Euphoria should interoperate with .NET as much as it
> currently
> does with C.

This would be a problem. .NET is a totally different architecture. There is
backward compatibility (you can call 'unsafe' old, native DLLs and routines), but
the other way around isn't possible. The only possibility is creating a
.NET-version of Euphoria, that compiles Euphoria-code into
.NET-assemblies/applications.

The most important question here is: what will we call it? 
A. Euphoria.NET
B. E# (pronounce: e sharp)
C. Something else

Vote for the name you want (or suggest a new name) at UBoard
(http://uboard.proboards32.com) in the 'General Board'.

--
tommy online: http://users.pandora.be/tommycarlier
Euphoria Message Board: http://uboard.proboards32.com