Re: plans for EU
- Posted by jimcbrown (admin) Mar 30, 2009
- 1019 views
Critic said...
mattlewis said...
You're still the only one who has noticed. I recall Derek asking for an example, so that it could be fixed. You never replied (that I noticedif I missed it, I'd happily accept a link). I'm interested, too.
I refer to the "rot" operation of his stack implementation. I am sure you remember.
Which was benchmarked, and found to be O(1) thanks to optimizations that Eu did.
Critic said...
mattlewis said...
Maybe you're referring to copy on write, and passing sequences around? As Derek showed, if this is a problem, there are different ways to do things to avoid this penalty.
It cannot be resolved right now. Matt, is spreading FUD all you can do?
Apparently it is all that you can do. Like I said above, it was shown to be resolved in Derek's own implementation.