Re: Euphoria file types
- Posted by SDPringle Mar 07, 2009
- 1288 views
I fully agree with the ideas you have put forward for the extensions and the reasons for them. Non MS OSes have only one interpreter so they fortunately don't need to worry about extensions. I think the Non-MS OSes work like exwc instead of exw.
Why do we have both an exw and exwc? Why not just have an option for when you want the interpreter to create a new console instead?
exwc foo.ex ( runs in the current console like ) exwc -nc foo.ex ( could be made to creates a new console )
exu foo.ex ( runs in current console ) exu -nc foo.ex ( opens a new console and runs foo.ex in it. )
And it is so inconsistent to have to put -CON in order to supress the creation of a new console Window on a translated application on one platform but then to not do so by default on the other.
Shawn Pringle
