Re: rev 4.0 call_back

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message
  • Posted by mattlewis (admin) Jan 27, 2009
  • 856 views
jimcbrown said...

I would have prefered that the DEP stuff be moved into the C code, rather than including dll.e in machine.e to handle the implementation in euphoria, but this is also a fairly unimportant detail.

Yeah, that's what I thought we were going to do, too, but I suppose it's not really performance critical code, so it probably doesn't matter.

Matt

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu