Re: rev 4.0 call_back
- Posted by mattlewis (admin) Jan 27, 2009
- 811 views
jimcbrown said...
mattlewis said...
bernie said...
...call_back() has been moved to a new standard library.
Yeah, I'm not sure why it was moved it in the first place.
The sole reason for this was to keep the set of includes in a tree graph.
(If call_back() was in dll.e, then dll.e would need to include machine.e - which includes dll.e currently in order to handle the DEP support)
Is that important? Being able to ignore this was one of the main benefits of adding forward referencing. We have multiple places in the standard library that have cycles in their dependency graphs.
Matt
