Re: Calling call_back addresses
- Posted by SDPringle Dec 31, 2008
- 1266 views
That's right. I clicked reply and changed the subject line. It seems the changing subject line doesn't put you on a new thread.
To me golf should be to minimize the interpreter itself (the c code) while getting all of the features of 4.0. That is many new builtins could have just been left as EUPHORIA code written with existing no no builtins. Regular expressions could have been implemented using c_func/c_proc calling into a dll or the binary itself.
Golf would seem to favor recursive algorithms to ones that simulate the runtime stack and also encourage more and smaller routines. It also favors code that uses routines that both load from and into some default variable and return on the stack rather than only returning on the stack.
Golf rules should also include:
Count all user identifers as some constant size no matter how long each would be and no recycling Variables allowed.
Shawn Pringle
