Re: buggy 4.0 program

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

When I look at the error about a missing identifier, I think, "Oh, puts must now be a function." When I see an error about "a is not defined", I think, "Oops, I forgot to put a type in front of a." The power of Euphoria is that the error reported very clearly told me where the problem was, making it very quick to fix. I'm glad some kind of compile-time error is being generated; but I'd rather not go back to the bad old days of C where an error on line 400 could mean a bug in line 25.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu