Re: buggy 4.0 program
- Posted by bernie Dec 10, 2008
- 1680 views
Matt, my trouble is not only about pointer position, but, mainly, about real
sense of the issued error message.
There was nothing to resolve in a.e, single reference doesn't require any resolving
at all. But the message just confuses a user - errorS, resolving, referenceS.
There was just non-declared name, single non-declared name in single file.
But pointer ... pointer is almost good ... just x-=1.
So, what about the sense of 4.0 message, sorry?
We have 15 years old tradition of that standard message.
Regards,
Igor Kachan
kinz@peterlink.ru
[/quote] Matt & Igor:
How about:
Missing reference: Variable 'a'
