Re: rev.e library

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message
DerekParnell said...
kinz said...

Remember please, just my role is strongly destructive,
I'm a tester now.

But what are you testing? Euphoria or the alpha packaging?

The first test in any testing is namely packaging.
Euphoria without its source is something uncertain now, nonsense.
So, I'm testing Euphoria 4.0 on alpha stage with its open source.

DerekParnell said...

We agree that the package had bugs and the next alpha will be better packaged ...

Good, it is one of the positive results of my testing too.

DerekParnell said...

but that has nothing to do with testing the Euphoria interpreter.

Remember please the very beginning - my simplest buggy 4.0 program.

DerekParnell said...

If what you want to test is not available in the current alpha, then you should wait for the next alpha package.

I'm too old to wait ... who knows the end of that waiting ... smile

Regards,
Igor Kachan
kinz@peterlink

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu