Re: rev.e library
- Posted by kinz Dec 08, 2008
- 1692 views
Again, Ok, but give us the replacement of full value for batch work with open source please.
Again. The makefiles are more than 'full value replacements' for the batch files.
Matt, sorry, read my wording once more please.
I'm talking about "the replacement of full value for batch work".
Your "makefiles" do some kind of batch work too, and Derek's .bat
file just controls wmake for comfortable work with that wmake.
I like Derek's batch file, it seems to be a good idea (I'll try it some time later on).
Ok, but I still don't understand what you mean by batch work.
See please, Matt:
http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=batch+work
Or just run some .bat file on DOS or Windows machine and press
Ctrl C to see a purest example of batch work (or job).
Derek's script updates some environment variables, and makes some assumptions about how his system is set up.
Derek's script is not the script, it is DOS/Windows butch file.
Do not confuse new comers, Matt, please.
We are talking about Windows for now.
It is not the Linux world with its scripts.
Let's use strongly suitable terms.
I think we all do things a bit differently.
Yes, Matt, without any objections!
What is it that you want the configure/make system to do that it doesn't already do?
There is no the configure/make system in 4.0 now, as far as I can see.
There is some private Derek's batch program, untested on other machines,
and yous recomendation to me to run two separate commands:
configure, which is pure DOS/Windows batch program, and
wmake -f makefile.wat winall, which is just yet another analog of some batch program
But these commands give me a bunch of error messages for now.
There was imake* system in v3, not perfect, but working for me.
It is abandoned at all now, in r1249 ...
Regards,
Igor Kachan
kinz@peterlink.ru
