Re: Ver. 4.0 Debugging SOLVED
- Posted by jimcbrown (admin) Oct 23, 2008
- 1020 views
Why would anyone expect a compiler to have bugs in it ? Euphoria version 4.0 doesn't have any.
Buggy compilers are the norm, not the exception to the rule.. I don't think I can name a single bug free compiler.
I am working with Win98 for the users that would like to use Euphoria on Win98 and are not wealthy enough to upgrade to the latest MS OS.
[/quote]
This is a fine goal. Bernie, I applaud you for doing your best on this.
A lot of users (such as myself) went to Linux and WINE, which sadly is better supported than W98 nowadays.
Maybe we should do away with Window2000 and XP
Then we would only have to worry about Vista.
I second this motion.
-- This is what I used as a configure.bat for WIN98 -- These are the only parameters that I know what they are used for -- since I don't have any other information. -- @echo off echo # Configuration for Watcom > config.wat echo EUBIN=D:\euphoria\bin >> config.wat echo MANAGED_MEM=1 >> config.wat if not exist transobj.wat copy transobj.dst transobj.wat if not exist intobj.wat copy intobj.dst intobj.wat if not exist backobj.wat copy backobj.dst backobj.wat if not exist dosobj.wat copy dosobj.dst dosobj.wat if not exist dosbkobj.wat copy dosbkobj.dst dosbkobj.wat if not exist dostrobj.wat copy dostrobj.dst dostrobj.wat
I'm not familiar with the EUBIN parameter. I do know about DEBUG and INT_CODES, as well as the (obsolete) EU3/PWD parameters. (You should never need INT_CODES, and DEBUG only makes sense if you are debugging C code of the interpreter or runtime library.)
