Re: eu c source no euphoria exe required to build
- Posted by mattlewis (admin) Sep 09, 2008
- 1071 views
SDPringle said...
It means effort was being concentrated on the .e files in include/std rather than the .e files in source/.
I think we understand what you meant, but Derek was questioning why you said it, because it is wrong. Different people have been working on different things. Here are all of the commits since r1100 that have affected something in the source/ directory (current revision is 1150):
svn log -r1100:head | grep "^r" said...
r1101 | mattlewis | 2008-08-30 21:32:54 -0400 (Sat, 30 Aug 2008) | 2 lines r1102 | mattlewis | 2008-08-30 22:37:55 -0400 (Sat, 30 Aug 2008) | 2 lines r1104 | mattlewis | 2008-08-31 17:40:15 -0400 (Sun, 31 Aug 2008) | 2 lines r1106 | jeremy_c | 2008-08-31 22:45:41 -0400 (Sun, 31 Aug 2008) | 1 line r1109 | mattlewis | 2008-09-01 06:30:55 -0400 (Mon, 01 Sep 2008) | 2 lines r1110 | mattlewis | 2008-09-01 08:37:36 -0400 (Mon, 01 Sep 2008) | 2 lines r1111 | mattlewis | 2008-09-01 13:02:21 -0400 (Mon, 01 Sep 2008) | 2 lines r1112 | mattlewis | 2008-09-01 15:02:28 -0400 (Mon, 01 Sep 2008) | 3 lines r1113 | derekparnell | 2008-09-01 17:28:58 -0400 (Mon, 01 Sep 2008) | 1 line r1114 | mattlewis | 2008-09-01 17:49:43 -0400 (Mon, 01 Sep 2008) | 4 lines r1118 | mattlewis | 2008-09-02 05:48:22 -0400 (Tue, 02 Sep 2008) | 5 lines r1120 | mattlewis | 2008-09-02 21:26:41 -0400 (Tue, 02 Sep 2008) | 2 lines r1121 | jeremy_c | 2008-09-03 10:06:51 -0400 (Wed, 03 Sep 2008) | 1 line r1122 | jeremy_c | 2008-09-03 10:24:42 -0400 (Wed, 03 Sep 2008) | 1 line r1126 | CChris | 2008-09-05 16:56:52 -0400 (Fri, 05 Sep 2008) | 6 lines r1130 | derekparnell | 2008-09-06 12:15:11 -0400 (Sat, 06 Sep 2008) | 5 lines r1131 | mattlewis | 2008-09-06 14:20:03 -0400 (Sat, 06 Sep 2008) | 2 lines r1132 | derekparnell | 2008-09-07 00:09:36 -0400 (Sun, 07 Sep 2008) | 1 line r1133 | CChris | 2008-09-07 06:57:49 -0400 (Sun, 07 Sep 2008) | 2 lines r1134 | derekparnell | 2008-09-07 09:20:52 -0400 (Sun, 07 Sep 2008) | 2 lines r1136 | jbrown105a | 2008-09-07 15:58:00 -0400 (Sun, 07 Sep 2008) | 1 line r1137 | jbrown105a | 2008-09-07 18:33:35 -0400 (Sun, 07 Sep 2008) | 2 lines r1138 | jbrown105a | 2008-09-07 18:39:39 -0400 (Sun, 07 Sep 2008) | 1 line r1139 | jbrown105a | 2008-09-07 19:20:07 -0400 (Sun, 07 Sep 2008) | 1 line r1140 | jbrown105a | 2008-09-07 23:28:10 -0400 (Sun, 07 Sep 2008) | 1 line r1141 | mattlewis | 2008-09-08 17:30:19 -0400 (Mon, 08 Sep 2008) | 3 lines r1142 | mattlewis | 2008-09-08 17:35:14 -0400 (Mon, 08 Sep 2008) | 2 lines r1143 | jbrown105a | 2008-09-08 17:58:54 -0400 (Mon, 08 Sep 2008) | 1 line r1144 | derekparnell | 2008-09-08 18:34:58 -0400 (Mon, 08 Sep 2008) | 1 line r1145 | jbrown105a | 2008-09-08 19:01:14 -0400 (Mon, 08 Sep 2008) | 1 line r1146 | derekparnell | 2008-09-09 01:22:38 -0400 (Tue, 09 Sep 2008) | 3 lines r1148 | jbrown105a | 2008-09-09 06:05:09 -0400 (Tue, 09 Sep 2008) | 1 line r1149 | jbrown105a | 2008-09-09 06:25:39 -0400 (Tue, 09 Sep 2008) | 1 line
So that's 33 commits out of 50 that dealt with the source directory. Anyway, the segfault was with the translator, not the interpreter. And it's been fixed.
Matt