Re: ver 4.0 builtin_chosen_warning ???

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message
  • Posted by euphoric (admin) Sep 05, 2008
  • 998 views
mattlewis said...
bernie said...

There is a problem with that because I used 'include map.e as sm' and the interpreter should not even be looking at namespace sm:compare()

Yes, but when you used compare() you did not qualify it.

If we write 'include map.e as sm,' doesn't that put the map.e compare() into a namespace that requires the namespace qualifier, or does it just make it convenient for avoiding conflicts? I guess it depends on how it's defined in map.e, eh?

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu