Re: WinClass question for Al
Al Getz wrote:
>
> don cole wrote:
<snip link to C++ article>
> Hi Don,
>
> I read that article and geeeeeeezzzzze, what a load 'a bull :)
>
> First off, if you take the whole thing as truth then someone is admitting that
> they
> threw a 'wrench in the works' some time ago, and lied about it. This means
> there's
> no telling if they are doing the exact same thing now... either in addition
> to back
> then, only back then, or only just now. This of course means maybe the real
> wrench
> is the new one. If they were lying back then too that's not too much of an
> issue
> right
> now. Of course there's a chance that it's not the real person anyway.
>
> From my own experiences with oop, some one is lying NOW, or trying to throw
> a wrench
> in the works NOW. There's just too many good points about oop (oop taken by
> itself
> apart from C++ itself) to put it down like that and still be able to say you
> have
> "at least a quarter of a brain left" he he.
>
> Also, the article sounds like it's too centered around C++ to be confused with
> notes
> on oop alone, but there are notes which seem to knock oop itself, even apart
> from
> C++, which are down right incorrect. The worst is the part about 'reusable
> code'.
> I've re-used wayyyyy too much code for different programs to EVER be able to
> agree
> with that :) I've even built classes from code that already existed, so i
> just
> dont see where this guy is coming from anymore.
>
> Maybe like Bob Fischer who after finding out the 'Russians' were cheating in
> top
> tourny's, he's going off the deep end.
>
>
> BTW, thanks for pulling that post up again.
>
> Take care,
> Al
>
> And, good luck with your Euphoria programming!
>
> My bumper sticker: "I brake for LED's"
Hey, Al. The article was meant as a joke, supposedly an interview with Bjarne
Stroustrup, the creator of C++.
--
"Actually, I'm sitting on my butt staring at a computer screen."
- Tom Tomorrow
j.
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
