1. OT: Qu language
Juergen: You'll probably snap at me for posting an offtopic message, but
if you do I'll list any that you have posted.
Irv: Do you still use Qu? I tried to install it on my system but the
autoconfig program didn't work.
Regards,
CraigG
Answer: one.
Question: How many psychics does it take to change a light bulb.
2. Re: OT: Qu language
- Posted by irv mullins <irvm at ellijay.com>
Nov 12, 2005
-
Last edited Nov 13, 2005
Craig Roberts wrote:
> Irv: Do you still use Qu? I tried to install it on my system but the
> autoconfig program didn't work.
Yes. There's a new version just out yesterday. Might try again.
Irv
3. Re: OT: Qu language
irv mullins wrote:
>
> Craig Roberts wrote:
>
> > Irv: Do you still use Qu? I tried to install it on my system but the
> > autoconfig program didn't work.
>
> Yes. There's a new version just out yesterday. Might try again.
>
> Irv
Qu looks to me like *another* OO language that is slower than Euphoria.
Based on their benchmarks, their JIT option barely beats interpreted Euphoria
v?.?, however the Eu2C translator would blow the socks off that any time.
I hope you decide to someday return back to Euphoria land.
Cheers,
Vincent
4. Re: OT: Qu language
Vincent wrote:
> Qu looks to me like *another* OO language that is slower than Euphoria.
Sorry, I think you're wrong on both counts, but this is Rob's forum,
so I won't use it to promote competing languages.
I will say this: using languages which have almost all of the features
people have discussed here ad nauseum has proven to me that those requests
were quite reasonable and well-founded.
Some of those features can be surprisingly useful, and obviously they need
not result in the dreaded 'slower execution' which has so often been used as
a reason for keeping such features out of Euphoria.
Regards,
Irv
5. Re: OT: Qu language
Downloading it now.
Regards,
CraigG
Answer: one.
Question: How many psychics does it take to change a light bulb.
