1. EUphorian Platforms
- Posted by jbrown105 at HotPOP.com Apr 23, 2001
- 375 views
Just wondering, how many platforms will Eu 2.3 be ported to? When will MacOS, BeOS, FreeBSD (don't your servers use this?), OpenBSD, NetBSD, Solaris, AIX, AUX, SunOS, JavaOS, MacOS X, etc. (I could just go on and on) be supported? -- Linux User:190064 Linux Machine:84163 http://jbrown105.1avenue.com
2. Re: EUphorian Platforms
- Posted by Robert Craig <rds at RapidEuphoria.com> Apr 23, 2001
- 368 views
jbrown writes: > Just wondering, how many platforms will Eu 2.3 be ported to? As I've said, I'd like to make the source available in some form for porting and other neat things. I haven't worked out the details yet, but Euphoria will not be open source or free. Regards, Rob Craig Rapid Deployment Software http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
3. Re: EUphorian Platforms
- Posted by jbrown105 at HotPOP.com Apr 24, 2001
- 384 views
I know. There's iBCS, which runs Linux programs on *BSD, and *BSD on Linux. (Executables, not source code.) Also, I know MacOS X is unix based (Mach), but how is Windows XP? (Also, but slighty off topic, is Windows XP a merger of NT and 9x?) TIA, jbrown On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:41:36PM +0000, sephiroth _ wrote: > > > > jbrown105 at HotPOP.com wrote: > > Just wondering, how many platforms will Eu 2.3 be ported to? When will > > MacOS, > > BeOS, FreeBSD (don't your servers use this?), OpenBSD, NetBSD, Solaris, > > AIX, AUX, SunOS, JavaOS, MacOS X, etc. (I could just go on and on) be > > supported? > > theoretically, after being ported to one flavor of UNIX, like say > Linux(oh wait, it already has!) with the right shared libraries, it > should run under any flavor of UNIX including MacOS X and Windows > XP(with Interix), and with a bit of tweaking, the BeOS. > > > -- Linux User:190064 Linux Machine:84163 http://jbrown105.1avenue.com
4. Re: EUphorian Platforms
- Posted by Ray Smith <smithr at ix.net.au> Apr 25, 2001
- 376 views
>Interix is a > set of.....stuff....that lets Windows XP(Windows 2001 in disguise) run > *NIX programs. technically, Windows 2000 was a merger of NT and 9x, > Windows XP is just the latest version of that. Is Interix still called Interix??? I "thought" (I have a bad memory) MS bought them and merged it with MS's own product (or just re-badged interix) to be called "Unix Services for Windows" ... or somthing like that. Also using Interix just allows source code to be re-compiled and run???? I don't think it always Unix programs to run. I "beleive" it is a similar product to Cygwin from RedHat??? Ray Smith