1. EUphorian Platforms

Just wondering, how many platforms will Eu 2.3 be ported to? When will MacOS,
BeOS, FreeBSD (don't your servers use this?), OpenBSD, NetBSD, Solaris,
AIX, AUX, SunOS, JavaOS, MacOS X, etc. (I could just go on and on) be supported?

-- 
Linux User:190064
Linux Machine:84163
http://jbrown105.1avenue.com

new topic     » topic index » view message » categorize

2. Re: EUphorian Platforms

jbrown writes:
> Just wondering, how many platforms will Eu 2.3 be ported to? 

As I've said, I'd like to make the source available
in some form for porting and other neat things.
I haven't worked out the details yet, but Euphoria
will not be open source or free.

Regards,
   Rob Craig
   Rapid Deployment Software
   http://www.RapidEuphoria.com

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

3. Re: EUphorian Platforms

I know. There's iBCS, which runs Linux programs on *BSD, and *BSD
on Linux. (Executables, not source code.) Also, I know MacOS X
is unix based (Mach), but how is Windows XP? (Also, but slighty off topic,
is Windows XP a merger of NT and 9x?)

TIA,
jbrown

On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:41:36PM +0000, sephiroth _ wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> jbrown105 at HotPOP.com wrote:
> > Just wondering, how many platforms will Eu 2.3 be ported to? When will 
> > MacOS,
> > BeOS, FreeBSD (don't your servers use this?), OpenBSD, NetBSD, Solaris,
> > AIX, AUX, SunOS, JavaOS, MacOS X, etc. (I could just go on and on) be 
> > supported?
> 
> theoretically, after being ported to one flavor of UNIX, like say 
> Linux(oh wait, it already has!) with the right shared libraries, it 
> should run under any flavor of UNIX including MacOS X and Windows 
> XP(with Interix), and with a bit of tweaking, the BeOS.
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Linux User:190064
Linux Machine:84163
http://jbrown105.1avenue.com

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

4. Re: EUphorian Platforms

>Interix is a
> set of.....stuff....that lets Windows XP(Windows 2001 in disguise) run
> *NIX programs. technically, Windows 2000 was a merger of NT and 9x,
> Windows XP is just the latest version of that.

Is Interix still called Interix???

I "thought" (I have a bad memory) MS bought them and merged it with MS's
own product (or just re-badged interix) to be called "Unix Services for
Windows"
... or somthing like that.

Also using Interix just allows source code to be re-compiled and run????
I don't think it always Unix programs to run.

I "beleive" it is a similar product to Cygwin from RedHat???

Ray Smith

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu