1. Help testing transparentBlt function
------------5E1669A2799F56B
Hi,
In the app I'm writing Win32Lib's transBlt has become a major
bottleneck, so I'm looking for a better (faster) way to do it.
The TransparentBlt function in MSIMG32.DLL seems perfect for the job,
but I'm not totally sure how will this is supported throughout the
various versions of windows.
I've attached a quick test, could anyone who has the time run this and
tell me the result along with any information you can give about your
system (OS version ect). It requires win32lib for a reason I haven't
been able to figure out yet (i don't use any win32lib functions but it just
doesn't work if i don't include it).
I know it won't work on every system, and I'm going to have an
alternate version, but if it doesn't work on the majority of systems
then I need to find another faster method.
Thanks very much to any one who can run it :)
Thomas Parslow (PatRat) ICQ #:26359483
Rat Software
http://www.rat-software.com/
Please leave quoted text in place when replying
------------5E1669A2799F56B
Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="transparentBlt.exw"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
2. Re: Help testing transparentBlt function
Everything is fine, TransparentBlt can be used:
PII 233mhz
128 meg ram
4Meg video Trident Cyber
Windows 98 SE
DirectX 8
IE 5.5
Euman
> Hi,
> In the app I'm writing Win32Lib's transBlt has become a major
> bottleneck, so I'm looking for a better (faster) way to do it.
> The TransparentBlt function in MSIMG32.DLL seems perfect for the job,
> but I'm not totally sure how will this is supported throughout the
> various versions of windows.
> I've attached a quick test, could anyone who has the time run this and
> tell me the result along with any information you can give about your
> system (OS version ect). It requires win32lib for a reason I haven't
> been able to figure out yet (i don't use any win32lib functions but it just
> doesn't work if i don't include it).
>
> I know it won't work on every system, and I'm going to have an
> alternate version, but if it doesn't work on the majority of systems
> then I need to find another faster method.
>
> Thanks very much to any one who can run it :)
>
> Thomas Parslow (PatRat) ICQ #:26359483
> Rat Software
> http://www.rat-software.com/
> Please leave quoted text in place when replying
3. Re: Help testing transparentBlt function
Howdy!
It said everything was fine. But I did get a sequence at the end of output:
{10}
OS: WIndows ME
CPU: Celeron
RAM: 32M
VIDEO RAM: 1M
RESOLUTION: 800x600 (True Color)
OPERATOR: Redneck 1970 vintage
Happy Hunting,
Travis Beaty
Claude, Texas.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Parslow (PatRat)" <patrat at rat-software.com>
To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 6:15 PM
Subject: Help testing transparentBlt function
>
>
> Hi,
> In the app I'm writing Win32Lib's transBlt has become a major
> bottleneck, so I'm looking for a better (faster) way to do it.
> The TransparentBlt function in MSIMG32.DLL seems perfect for the job,
> but I'm not totally sure how will this is supported throughout the
> various versions of windows.
> I've attached a quick test, could anyone who has the time run this and
> tell me the result along with any information you can give about your
> system (OS version ect). It requires win32lib for a reason I haven't
> been able to figure out yet (i don't use any win32lib functions but it
just
> doesn't work if i don't include it).
>
> I know it won't work on every system, and I'm going to have an
> alternate version, but if it doesn't work on the majority of systems
> then I need to find another faster method.
>
> Thanks very much to any one who can run it :)
>
> Thomas Parslow (PatRat) ICQ #:26359483
> Rat Software
> http://www.rat-software.com/
> Please leave quoted text in place when replying
>
>
>
