1. callback etc
sorry, i meant to mention this was for DOS, not windows,
noah
Greg Harris wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Aug 1999 15:01:11 -0500, noah smith
> <option1 at OPTIONINTERACTIVE.COM> wrote:
>
> Why not just use Windows sockets?
>
> Greg Harris
> >Ok, now I totally guessing here, but it would seem that call_back()
> >returns a 32-bit address referring to a location in memory of the
code
> >associated with a call to routine_id().
> >So, i guess the question is, is it possible to coax euphoria into
giving
> >up more information about a function/procedure, so that another run
can
> >use it?
> >
