1. EuForum Suggestion
- Posted by Al Getz <Xaxo at aol.com> Jun 28, 2004
- 418 views
Hello again, It would be nice to have a 'review' page come up so that you can check your post before it's sent. Quite a few web sites have this now, and also include a way to correct a post even after it's been sent ('edit post'). I think that would help to round out the EuForum very nicely. Take care, Al And, good luck with your Euphoria programming! My bumper sticker: "I brake for LED's"
2. Re: EuForum Suggestion
- Posted by "Unkmar" <L3Euphoria at bellsouth.net> Jun 28, 2004
- 400 views
----- Original Message ----- From: "Al Getz" Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:38 PM Subject: EuForum Suggestion > posted by: Al Getz > > Hello again, > > It would be nice to have a 'review' page come up so that you > can check your post before it's sent. Quite a few web sites > have this now, and also include a way to correct a post > even after it's been sent ('edit post'). > I think that would help to round out the EuForum very nicely. > Sounds great for the cases before sending. but once it has been sent. There are those of us that are signed up VIA email. A changed post seems. editied/altered/modified/inaccurate/corrupted What is said is said. wether it be intentional or not. It would leave some with a greater power of removal of their contributions just because they decide they don't want to support Euphoria anymore. What they have contributed freely and openly at a given time should remain free and open. This does not mean that they should be required to maintain and provide access to said data. But if someone else is willing to keep and provide access to said data it shouldn't be so easily stricten from existance based on one persons attitudal whim. I'll not name names of those that have done such things already. But trust me. They are definately out there. I can think of 2 without flinching. I'm still in contact with both of them. But that doesn't mean I condone their explicit removal of supporting information that was given free of will during one of their happier times. Another thing to state. It really stinks when one updates a lib and it never makes it to the contributions. Now, don't ask me why it hasn't made it. All I know is that I made and update.. And I am one of the original creators of said code. It isn't just an update. But also a bug fix. The buggy version persists and the update isn't even known of by any other than me. That is horrible as well. unkmar
3. Re: EuForum Suggestion
- Posted by Al Getz <Xaxo at aol.com> Jun 28, 2004
- 388 views
Hi unkmar, You're right unkmar, sometimes people delete messages and that throws off the whole flow of the thread. That means allowing a change would have to have a time limit, or as you said, dont allow this. I'd still like to see the review page however. Im sorry to hear your update didnt make it to the Eu archive, but i bet something went wrong and maybe you should contact Rob, or simply try resending it again? Hope you have better luck in the future with your updates. Al Unkmar wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Al Getz" > Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:38 PM > Subject: EuForum Suggestion > > > > posted by: Al Getz > > > > Hello again, > > > > It would be nice to have a 'review' page come up so that you > > can check your post before it's sent. Quite a few web sites > > have this now, and also include a way to correct a post > > even after it's been sent ('edit post'). > > I think that would help to round out the EuForum very nicely. > > > > Sounds great for the cases before sending. > but once it has been sent. There are those > of us that are signed up VIA email. > A changed post seems. > editied/altered/modified/inaccurate/corrupted > > What is said is said. wether it be intentional or not. > It would leave some with a greater power of removal > of their contributions just because they decide > they don't want to support Euphoria anymore. > > What they have contributed freely and openly at a > given time should remain free and open. This does > not mean that they should be required to maintain > and provide access to said data. But if someone > else is willing to keep and provide access to said > data it shouldn't be so easily stricten from existance > based on one persons attitudal whim. > > I'll not name names of those that have done such > things already. But trust me. They are definately > out there. I can think of 2 without flinching. I'm > still in contact with both of them. But that doesn't > mean I condone their explicit removal of supporting > information that was given free of will during one > of their happier times. > > Another thing to state. It really stinks when one > updates a lib and it never makes it to the contributions. > Now, don't ask me why it hasn't made it. All I know > is that I made and update.. And I am one of the original > creators of said code. It isn't just an update. But also > a bug fix. The buggy version persists and the update > isn't even known of by any other than me. That is > horrible as well. > > unkmar > > Take care, Al And, good luck with your Euphoria programming! My bumper sticker: "I brake for LED's"
4. Re: EuForum Suggestion
- Posted by Robert Craig <rds at RapidEuphoria.com> Jun 28, 2004
- 384 views
Unkmar wrote: > It really stinks when one > updates a lib and it never makes it to the contributions. If you submit something and it doesn't appear within about 24 hours, and you don't hear anything from RDS about it, then please submit it again. Sometimes the file upload will fail. Other times the e-mail that the system sends to notify us will not come through for some reason (spam filtering, system down, whatever). Over 90% of the time things run smoothly. We never quietly reject or ignore any contribution. If we don't like it (very rare), we'll tell you. Regards, Rob Craig Rapid Deployment Software http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
5. Re: EuForum Suggestion
- Posted by cklester <cklester at yahoo.com> Jun 28, 2004
- 408 views
Robert Craig wrote: > > > We never quietly reject or ignore any contribution. > If we don't like it (very rare), we'll tell you. Well, I still don't see the program I uploaded about a month ago that lets you hack into any bank's computer system and download wads of cash to your own account, privately and anonymously. If they ever catch you, which is highly unlikely due to the extremely complicated MD5 path determination algorithm I developed from scratch one night, then all you have to say is, "Hmmmm. How'd that get there?" I found some bugs in it, though, so maybe it's good it didn't make it. Like, in one case, I tried to download $20,000 to my account, but it accidentally downloaded $200,000. I guess it was that dang Pentium bug. Anyway, I'll try again later after I add some more AI components. -=ck "Programming in a state of EUPHORIA."