1. RE: Feature requests for Eu 2.5.
- Posted by Ray Smith <smithr at ix.net.au> Aug 19, 2003
- 482 views
Derek Parnell wrote: > > > On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 03:15:50 +0000 (08/19/03 13:15:50) > , <Christian.CUVIER at agriculture.gouv.fr> wrote: > > > > > Beware the long post... > > [snip] > > Well this is all very fine, Christian, but what should RDS do on the > second > day? It is a great list though!!! Many of these things I (and many others) have wanted. The only point I don't agree with is nested routines. Of the languages I have used that have nested routines I've never found the need to use them. Obviously not all of these will be implemented .... BUT If less than 5-6 of these suggestions aren't implemented in the next version of Euphoria RDS are saying they have no interest "at all" in the feedback of users. How long can a company ignore the constant requests of users? Regards, Ray Smith http://rays-web.com
2. RE: Feature requests for Eu 2.5.
- Posted by Christian.CUVIER at agriculture.gouv.fr Aug 19, 2003
- 456 views
Derek Parnell wrote: > > > On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 03:15:50 +0000 (08/19/03 13:15:50) > , <Christian.CUVIER at agriculture.gouv.fr> wrote: > > > > > Beware the long post... > > [snip] > > Well this is all very fine, Christian, but what should RDS do on the > second > day? > Implement most of these, based on the community priorities and available time. What else? CChris > -- > > cheers, > Derek Parnell >