1. [OT] was: Re: Dictionary
- Posted by Pete Lomax <petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk> Oct 25, 2003
- 349 views
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 22:41:07 +0000, Al Getz <Xaxo at aol.com> wrote: Oh dear, like a moth to a flame... I'm sorry all, but I have to state my thoughts. >Trouble is, i guess, is that some people on this >list have a very nasty attitude towards others opinions >and ideas. That is blatently unfair. Kat brought a lot of criticism on herself by her own attitude. This list is quite generous and forgiving, imo. Besides, Kat gave as well as she took, and I don't remember her ever asking anyone, or you, to stand up on her behalf, quite the contrary. > That's not the way to promote advancement in >any field. Tell Kat that. > Bluntly mocking other's ideas or opinions >is the surest way to put them off. But if someone is wrong, or out of order, they should be told. Remember the bile and vitriol Kat spewed on this list because no-one could write a "reverse server" or whatever it was called she wanted? >I have to admit though, i've had my own >problems which sometimes means i might not be in as good >a mood as usual, but im hopeing to improve personally >in that area myself so that i dont snap at others, or >treat them in a way i wouldnt 'normally' treat them. Agreed, You're not human if that ain't so... >I've been in a very bad mood a few weeks after XP, >which disappointed me, to say the least. MS is got >the most problems with their software then anything >i've ever seen before. I keep asking myself, how the >heck did they get to where they are now with such crap Brilliant marketing, unfair practices, blatent theft, and cutting costs by not fixing bugs >If you're not charging anything for your program, that's one >thing, but when you charge almost $200 for something it >should work VERY WELL. Am i wrong here? Not in theory... >What we need someday is a Euphoria operating system LOL >Might take longer to produce, ROTFL >but at least it will get better and better, ROTFCMSALMAO .. >I have to appoligize if i offended anyone in the past, and >all i can ask is that if anyone was offended in any way >that they email me and let me know what it was about. Ditto Pete
2. Re: [OT] was: Re: Dictionary
- Posted by Irv <irvm at ellijay.com> Oct 26, 2003
- 364 views
On Sunday 26 October 2003 08:05 am, you wrote: > > Hello Pete, > > Well, im not taking sides because i dont know the whole story, but > i know one thing already: Of all the forums i visit, this one > has the nastiest people (sometimes, not all the time though).... Clearly, you've never been to a perl goup :) Irv