1. Win32Lib being restrictive
I'm sorry for heaving been unclear in pointing out some (actually only one,
at least for me) "flaws" in Win32Lib. Maybe is my not-so-good command of
English that makes seem a criticism what that I would tell as a "missing
feature".
Maybe e-mail is not the proper mean to convey the real feeling about an
issue.
I'm very happy about David's work in providing us that great wrapper that is
Win32Lib, and I'm also aware that Win32Lib is a "pre-alpha". I didn't want
at all to hurt anyone's feeling with my words, and, come on ,David, don't
care so much about my opinions...and go on with your great work !
Ciao
Maurizio
2. Re: Win32Lib being restrictive
------ =_NextPart_000_01BD6859.310F3460
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Maurizio.
> "flaws" in Win32Lib
Sorry if I gave the impression I was upset about complaints with =
Win32Lib. I certainly don't mind the complaints about Win32Lib - I've =
got my share of them.
I was just trying to express my frustration in finding out that someone =
had found a *major* flaw without submitting a bug report. But I didn't =
take it personally, and didn't mean for my complaint to be taken =
personally, either. I guess I just wanted to encourage people to submit =
their bug reports, instead of assuming that they were part of the =
"feature list." 
Thanks!
-- David Cuny
------ =_NextPart_000_01BD6859.310F3460
