1. RE: [Off Topic now] embedded eu scripting in a eu program?
At 03:54 PM 3/1/03 +0000, you wrote:
<snip>
>"aging", actually...
<snip>
LOL! I actually carefully spell checked my posting and I originally wrote
"aging" but it looked wrong. A quick look in my Oxford Minidictionary had
"ageing" so I changed it. Now that we're getting pedantic 
a look in
the thicker (and heavier) Penguin Dictionary shows that both spellings are
acceptable. This is confirmed via www.google.co.uk which gives 600,000 odd
hits for "ageing" but a massive 4,000,000 odd for "aging". It's probably
one of those Brit/Yank colour/color things.
Regards,
Andy Cranston.
2. RE: [Off Topic now] embedded eu scripting in a eu program?
acran at readout.fsnet.co.uk wrote:
> At 03:54 PM 3/1/03 +0000, you wrote:
> <snip>
> >"aging", actually...
> <snip>
>
> LOL! I actually carefully spell checked my posting and I originally
> wrote
> "aging" but it looked wrong. A quick look in my Oxford Minidictionary
> had
> "ageing" so I changed it. Now that we're getting pedantic a look in
> the thicker (and heavier) Penguin Dictionary shows that both spellings
> are
> acceptable. This is confirmed via www.google.co.uk which gives 600,000
> odd
> hits for "ageing" but a massive 4,000,000 odd for "aging". It's
> probably
> one of those Brit/Yank colour/color things.
>
I suspected as much, but I didn't want to ruin the joke with a bunch of
facts...
