1. Shared Memory in Linux anyone?
- Posted by cEnsE <cense at MAIL.RU> Jan 28, 2001
- 513 views
I think topica wont let me post, so im with bernie and will still use the old listserv until it shuts down. Hello all, How do people on this list feel about a wrapper for shared memory functionality in linux? I have not looked yet at the archives and contributions to see if there is one already but if there is not would there be any demand for such a wrapper? Shared memory allows two or more processes to share the same memory locations to exchange data between them. (fast!) -- evil, corruption and bad taste ^[cense]
2. Re: Shared Memory in Linux anyone?
- Posted by Bernie <xotron at LOCALNET.COM> Jan 28, 2001
- 432 views
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 05:36:14 -0700, cEnsE <cense at MAIL.RU> wrote: >How do people on this list feel about a wrapper for shared memory >functionality in linux? I have not looked yet at the archives and >contributions to see if there is one already but if there is not >would there be any demand for such a wrapper? > >Shared memory allows two or more processes to share the same memory locations >to exchange data between them. (fast!) cense: I can't think of any application that would need to use shared memory. What type of application did you have in mind.
3. Re: Shared Memory in Linux anyone?
- Posted by cEnsE <cense at MAIL.RU> Jan 28, 2001
- 448 views
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Bernie wrote: >> On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 05:36:14 -0700, cEnsE <cense at MAIL.RU> wrote: >> >> >How do people on this list feel about a wrapper for shared memory >> >functionality in linux? I have not looked yet at the archives and >> >contributions to see if there is one already but if there is not >> >would there be any demand for such a wrapper? >> > >> >Shared memory allows two or more processes to share the same memory >> locations >> >to exchange data between them. (fast!) >> >> cense: >> >> I can't think of any application that would need to use shared memory. >> What type of application did you have in mind. No applications NEED shared memory as far as i know but i thought it might be a cool little thingy to replace the use of sockets or the such across two processes on the same machine because its faster (or so i have been told) I was just going to experiment with shared memory in C a bit, find out if it really is useful and then possibly wrap some routines up. nothing major i guess. -- evil, corruption and bad taste ^[cense]