1. RE: EUPHORIA 64-Bit Programming?
Hi Rob,
Robert Craig wrote:
> > Also, what about parallel processing and threading?
>
> Yes, when enough people need it.
Was this a "tongue-in-cheek" answer for never?
How many people is "enough"???
For some reason I have the need to say ...
"If you build it they will come"
Regards,
Ray Smith
http://rays-web.com
2. RE: EUPHORIA 64-Bit Programming?
Robert Craig wrote:
>
>
> C. K. Lester wrote:
[Snip]
>
> > Also, what about parallel processing and threading?
>
> Yes, when enough people need it.
>
> Regards,
> Rob Craig
> Rapid Deployment Software
> http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
>
>
Lucius
3. RE: EUPHORIA 64-Bit Programming?
Robert Craig wrote:
>
>
> C. K. Lester wrote:
> > Is EUPHORIA going to be 64-bit happiness?
>
> Yes, when enough people have 64-bit machines.
>
> > Also, what about parallel processing and threading?
>
> Yes, when enough people need it.
>
> Regards,
> Rob Craig
> Rapid Deployment Software
> http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
>
>
Lucius
parallel processing and threading
Sorry about the other post. I'm not use to the web interface.
I need it. Not for me. but for the others.
If they had it. they would produce more code that would be more flexible
and more usable. I have thought of several places where lack of
threading has caused others to simply use another language.
eh, but I'm just 1 more voice.
Lucius L. Hilley III - Unkmar
4. RE: EUPHORIA 64-Bit Programming?
Robert Craig wrote:
> Adding threads to the interpreter would be a major job.
> It's not just a matter of adding a few built-in
> or library routines. Check my previous posts on this subject
> for the details.
I fully understand the complexity of such a change. I think from
memory I was one (of the many people) who asked this question in the
past.
It doesn't change the fact that threads (along with exception
handling and to a lesser extend OO) are tools that I *won't* program
without.
Regards,
Ray Smith
http://rays-web.com
