1. EUPHORIA 64-Bit Programming?

Is EUPHORIA going to be 64-bit happiness?

Also, what about parallel processing and threading?

new topic     » topic index » view message » categorize

2. Re: EUPHORIA 64-Bit Programming?

C. K. Lester wrote:
> Is EUPHORIA going to be 64-bit happiness?

Yes, when enough people have 64-bit machines.

> Also, what about parallel processing and threading?

Yes, when enough people need it.

Regards,
    Rob Craig
    Rapid Deployment Software
    http://www.RapidEuphoria.com

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

3. Re: EUPHORIA 64-Bit Programming?

On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 04:53:37 +0000 (06/19/03 14:53:37)
, Ray Smith <smithr at ix.net.au> wrote:

>
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> Robert Craig wrote:
>> > Also, what about parallel processing and threading?
>>
>> Yes, when enough people need it.
>
> Was this a "tongue-in-cheek" answer for never?
>
> How many people is "enough"???
>
> For some reason I have the need to say ...
>
> "If you build it they will come"
>

LOL. I was thinking along the same lines, Ray.

Co-routines would be perfect for implementing generic iterators.

Threads would be perfect for SO MANY types of applications - Web and Chat 
clients, servers of all types, ...

We aren't building these type of apps now in Eu with the advantages of 
threads because we can't.

It reminds me of the old joke...

A man was seen spraying vinegar around his garden. His neighbour asked him 
why he was doing that. He replied that is keeps away the elephants. To 
which his neighbour said "But there are no elephants in this city!". The 
man just said "See. It works!"

IN much the same manner, people are not building Eu apps that depend on 
threads, so therefore threads aren't needed in Euphoria.

-- 
cheers,
Derek Parnell

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

4. Re: EUPHORIA 64-Bit Programming?

Ray Smith wrote:
> Robert Craig wrote:
> 
>>>Also, what about parallel processing and threading?
>>
>>Yes, when enough people need it.
> 
> Was this a "tongue-in-cheek" answer for never?

No.

> How many people is "enough"???

I don't know.

Adding threads to the interpreter would be a major job.
It's not just a matter of adding a few built-in
or library routines. Check my previous posts on this subject
for the details.

Regards,
    Rob Craig
    Rapid Deployment Software
    http://www.RapidEuphoria.com

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

5. Re: EUPHORIA 64-Bit Programming?

On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:57:57 -0500, "C. K. Lester"
<cklester at yahoo.com> wrote:

moment

in a

>Is EUPHORIA going to be 64-bit happiness?
Probably whenever someone writes a 64-bit happy C compiler?
Is there any other criteria?

I feel like it
>
>Also, what about parallel processing and threading?
I will answer

When, and if

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

6. Re: EUPHORIA 64-Bit Programming?

On 19 Jun 2003, at 21:55, Pete Lomax wrote:

> 
> 
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:57:57 -0500, "C. K. Lester"
> <cklester at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> moment
> 
> in a
> 
> >Is EUPHORIA going to be 64-bit happiness?
> Probably whenever someone writes a 64-bit happy C compiler?
> Is there any other criteria?
> 
> I feel like it
> >
> >Also, what about parallel processing and threading?
> I will answer
> 
> When, and if

lol

Kat

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu