1. RE: Lower WAV pitch problem
- Posted by Bernie Ryan <xotron at bluefrognet.net> May 31, 2003
- 469 views
Dan: You maybe creating a harmonic of the original. Try changing the original by something other than one half or double which would create a harmonic. Bernie
2. RE: Lower WAV pitch problem
- Posted by rforno at tutopia.com Jun 01, 2003
- 478 views
Dan: May I help you by looking at your code to see where it went wrong? Regards. ----- Original Message ----- From: Dan Moyer <DANIELMOYER at prodigy.net> Subject: Re: Lower WAV pitch problem > > > Bernie, > > thanks, but I was making the pitch twice as low so I could later go through > and try to remove every other cycle, so as to have made the pitch lower but > retain the original time duration of the sample (I couldn't figure a good > way to do this for any other pitch change without introducing distortion). > In other words, adding a new point in between every data point should just > have made it 1/2 the pitch but twice as long in time, I thought. Looking > graphically at the derived wave form, it looks essentially identical to the > original, just "stretched" out in time, without anything which would look > like harmonics. > > Dan Moyer > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bernie Ryan" <xotron at bluefrognet.net> > To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com> > Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 7:25 AM > Subject: RE: Lower WAV pitch problem > > > > Dan: > > You maybe creating a harmonic of the original. > > Try changing the original by something other > > than one half or double which would create a > > harmonic. > > > > Bernie > > > > > > TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE! > > > > > > > TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE! > >
3. RE: Lower WAV pitch problem
- Posted by rforno at tutopia.com Jun 04, 2003
- 438 views
Dan: The problem was not "a bunch of harmonics", but rather that each harmonic was exactly at a frequency *twice* of the previous one. Regards. ----- Original Message ----- From: Dan Moyer <DANIELMOYER at prodigy.net> Subject: Re: Lower WAV pitch problem > > > Bernie, > > As Ricardo has now explained to me privately, you're probably right, thanks. > I made my test wave with a bunch of harmonics to begin with, if I hadn't > done that it might not have been a problem. > > Dan Moyer > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bernie Ryan" <xotron at bluefrognet.net> > To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com> > Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 7:25 AM > Subject: RE: Lower WAV pitch problem > > > > Dan: > > You maybe creating a harmonic of the original. > > Try changing the original by something other > > than one half or double which would create a > > harmonic. > > > > Bernie > > > > > > TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE! > > > > > > > TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE! > >
4. RE: Lower WAV pitch problem
- Posted by rforno at tutopia.com Jun 04, 2003
- 440 views
<big snip> > This works without changing the pitch (other than dropping everything > an octave) <snip> > Kat So, it works without changing the pitch... by changing the pitch a big amount!
5. RE: Lower WAV pitch problem
- Posted by gertie at visionsix.com Jun 04, 2003
- 441 views
On 4 Jun 2003, at 1:19, rforno at tutopia.com wrote: > > > <big snip> > > > This works without changing the pitch (other than dropping everything > > an octave) > <snip> > > > Kat > > So, it works without changing the pitch... by changing the pitch a big > amount! Right, a C in one octave becomes a C an octave lower. Kat
6. RE: Lower WAV pitch problem
- Posted by rforno at tutopia.com Jun 06, 2003
- 447 views
Of course, I know that, but changing the pitch one octave *is* changing the pitch. ----- Original Message ----- From: <gertie at visionsix.com> Subject: RE: Lower WAV pitch problem > > > On 4 Jun 2003, at 1:19, rforno at tutopia.com wrote: > > > > > <big snip> > > > > > This works without changing the pitch (other than dropping everything > > > an octave) > > <snip> > > > > > Kat > > > > So, it works without changing the pitch... by changing the pitch a big > > amount! > > Right, a C in one octave becomes a C an octave lower. > > Kat > > > > TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE! > >